Since the Hamilton files came to my attention a number of things seem to have fallen into place.

It was Thursday 19 May 2011 while I was chasing up a number of AfterLife links that I came across a lot of academics from the late 19th Century up to the present day who not only believed in Survival but who had conducted experiments which proved it, really beyond ANY reasonable doubt. So how come it is not generally accepted as a fact? To me it is comparable to the flat earth thinking or the geocentric model of the solar system.

Recently, like the last 2 or 3 years I have been studying NLP and other associated positive psychology concepts to help and improve living and live better lifestyles. The developing mind control has resulted in some significant improvements in my life not the least of which was stopping smoking. The idea of Survival, that some aspect of a human beings personality survives the demise of the physical body means that the body could be regarded as a "machine" with a "man" in it. How that could be at this time is not relevant let alone known or understood, but it can be regarded as a fact from the vast amount of evidence that is available. What it really means is that the human mind has control of maybe a lot more than just what it thinks about and what it lives in.

For Science to be quoted as saying there is no proof of any of this area of human experience is a blatant media lie which is increasingly being exposed as more and more Scientists are prepared to do research in this area and to admit that there is sufficient evidence to warrant a dramatic increase in that research.

Scientific proof of the afterlife is available from many places:

Victor Zammit's web-site

http://www.aspsi.org/feat/life_after/tymn/testimonials.htm

Then there are people like:

Gordon Smith's web-site

David Thompson